"It's just not fair to say that those who voted for the resolution wanted war" -- Bill Clinton
It's not? So is it fair to assume that those judges who voted for Roe v. Wade to pass don't really want abortions to happen, or that Al Gore really doesn't mean we're in trouble when he says that global warming is going to kill us all. Clinton (Bill) has recently complained about all the attention Obama is taking away from Hillary among the anti-war crowd. Maybe someone should tell him that when someone votes for something, they're assumed to believe in the cause that they voted for. And it's not like this was just a resolution voted on four years ago. Just in January of this year, before she announced her candidacy, she stated that she wouldn't support a timetable for leaving Iraq. However after she officially started her campaign, she demanded that President Bush "extricate the country before he leaves office." Maybe Bill and Hillary both would like divorce papers with their flowers next year for Valentine's Day, along with most of the Democrats in Congress.
Friday, March 23, 2007
Thursday, March 1, 2007
Stealing Profits
A strategic energy fund to jumpstart research?
I believe that Mrs. Clinton should take a look at the oil company's budgets already for researching cleaner energy sources.
In her speech, she called for the government to "take profits" from oil companies in order to create her so called "strategic energy fund". Since when does a capitalist economy take profits from its companies? ExxonMobil, for one example, has 9% profit margins, and that's supposed to be way too high?? I wonder how many percent the Clinton's portfolio earned last year. I'm guessing it was about double that.
I'm anxious to see how many votes this will swing over to Obama when the polls come out next week. This is just the stuff that's driving people in her own party away from her.
I believe that Mrs. Clinton should take a look at the oil company's budgets already for researching cleaner energy sources.
In her speech, she called for the government to "take profits" from oil companies in order to create her so called "strategic energy fund". Since when does a capitalist economy take profits from its companies? ExxonMobil, for one example, has 9% profit margins, and that's supposed to be way too high?? I wonder how many percent the Clinton's portfolio earned last year. I'm guessing it was about double that.
I'm anxious to see how many votes this will swing over to Obama when the polls come out next week. This is just the stuff that's driving people in her own party away from her.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)